18 December 2006
Government
plans to allow patients a chance to avoid their medical history being uploaded
to a centralised NHS ‘Spine’ database—but only if they can prove that doing so
would cause them substantial mental distress [1]—were condemned today by
privacy campaigners NO2ID [2]. The Government has decided to go forward with
the scheme, which will mean personal records being accessible to in excess of
400,000 clinicians and officials [3], despite the fact that the privacy systems
originally planned are not working [4]. It has also withdrawn its implied
promise to allow people a choice [5].
Guy
Herbert, NO2ID’s General Secretary said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6184043.stm
3. The Department of Health’s own figures showed
298,973 NHS staff registered to use the
system at 1st December 2006, with many more to join them.
See:
http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/faq/delivery
4. There was
to have been a system of “sealed envelopes” for information defined as
confidential by patients or clinicians – the relevant DoH documents describing
its objects as: “1. Building confidence,
2. Offering choice and giving control, 3. Dissuade patients from dissenting,
4.Enable sharing of
PSIS [Personal Spine Information Service] messages” (Our emphasis.) See: www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/crdb/sealed_envelopes.ppt
[MS Powerpoint]
But
they aren’t working yet. See:
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,,1491908,00.html (An article of May, which is still valid,
since they still aren’t working.) How
information, once shared on the main Spine, might be sealed again is an
unanswered technical question.
5. John
Hutton MP, then the relevant minister, in Hansard, 2 Nov 2004 : Column 176W
“Patients
will have the right to specify that detailed information recorded at the point
of contact with the NHS should not be available to other NHS organisations via
the summary record held on their NHS care record. They will also have the right
to define some information as especially sensitive and only accessible under
terms of explicit consent.”
See:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/vo041102/text/41102w08.htm
6. “…building
up a comprehensive patient history,” a phrase which recurs in many documents
relating to the NHS Programme for IT, notably the Scottish Executive’s most
comprehensive “Building a Health Service Fit for the Future” See:
https://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/05/23141500/15035
(Which
also discusses the merger of health and social care records to form a yet
bigger and yet more intrusive system.)
7. See:
http://www.nhsconfidentiality.org/?page_id=9
The NO2ID Campaign
Box 412
19-21 Crawford Street
London W1H 1PJ
enquiries@no2id.net
Tel: 07005 800 651
Press: click here